217 replies to this topic

[autumnallman]

here's a pic provided in the link below that I took November 3rd 2011 on accident. Check it out, I posted it at other sites as well and I would love to have been analyzed by anybody who feels they are worthy of doing so. Thanks!

http://www.ghoststud...un2015_1007.htm

Edited by autumnallman, 25 August 2015 - 01:09 AM.

[JIMOverSeer]

Cool photo for sure... thanks Autumn for sharing it with us at GhostStudy.com  
.

[Banshee302]

photos of portals are more important than photos of that which goes through them, agreed? lol

autumnallman, on 25 August 2015 - 01:06 AM, said:

here's a pic provided in the link below that I took November 3rd 2011 on accident. Check it out, I posted it at other sites as well and I would love to have been analyzed by anybody who feels they are worthy of doing so. Thanks!

http://www.ghoststud...un2015_1007.htm

did someone steal his girlfriend?

[Snowlord]

This photo ( the Photo Gallery photo ), judging by the angle and distance and position of the railing and storefront to the left of the image, was taken from the higher level  ... above the one indicated in the Photo Gallery Analysis. They are obviously looking down on this storefront, not right across from it as it would be in the Photo Gallery analysis. The "tie" looks similar to some of the flags hanging at a folded angle on the upper level in the background. The "sniper rifle" looks like it could be one of the light poles on the upper level. They have globe lights on them, and I see a globe in the Photo gallery analysis image.

The buildings and background to the right of the man's head are at the wrong angle, wrong size, and wrong proportions to the buildings on the left of the woman's head. It looks like two different images combined. What is to the right of the man's head doesn't belong and seems to have been added or combined some how. Everything but the shadow figure has a direct explanation from the images. Maybe that was added somehow accidentally along with the aberrant section of the photograph, or maybe it was added intentionally to add to the effect caused by the other actual items. No way to tell that as far as I know from the image.









Update to my analysis ...


This image clearly shows the "ghostly figure" is just an image painted on the building. The angles in the original still look wrong, but all is clearly explained.





Another image of it ... from Google Maps ...






.
.

Edited by Snowlord, 07 September 2015 - 05:20 PM.

[lorac61469]

Good job Snowlord!  I tried searching images online but didnt have any luck.

[Vlawde]

Good job!

[Snowlord]

When I click the link above in the person's request for analysis it doesn't take me to this Image I analyzed any more. Did something change? ... or did I get a glitch that took me to the wrong image on the gallery page?


Edited to add ...

This was the picture in question that was asked to be analyzed originally ...





Looking at it even more carefully I see that it could be just a warped perspective causing the differences in angles that made me think of a composite image. Camera lenses can do that under the right conditions sometimes.
.

Edited by Snowlord, 09 September 2015 - 07:12 AM.

[JIMOverSeer]

That page was removed because of viewer concerns. I told them, as I'm stating here, that I will look into the matter and make a decision. I see that you have a concern about the shadow image (person)... I'll be asking the local shop owners in that vicinity about that as well. Thanks
.

[Snowlord]

Jim@GhostStudy, on 09 September 2015 - 09:34 AM, said:

...  I see that you have a concern about the shadow person...

I don't have a concern as such, but submitted an analysis in response to the request for an analysis of the image.

[JIMOverSeer]

That's what I meant... sorry.

[KlaineyGStudy]

Wow good detective work here Snowlord

[JIMOverSeer]

Snowlord... thanks for solving that shadow figure mystery.... that's good research on your part and much appreciated!
I went to your source on Google maps and found what you had noted and it's pretty incredible that the figure is spread across a building.
I may go ahead and call the Athlete's Foot store (who is next door) and see what they know about it too.

There were some other issues as well with the page.... so I'm glad I pulled it when I did.
Thanks again my friend.
.

[Snowlord]

Would be interesting if you do find out what the image on the building is all about.

Edited by Snowlord, 12 September 2015 - 04:55 AM.

[JIMOverSeer]

Snowlord... I'll let you know what I find out... I'm thinking it was a temporary placement.
Thanks again for all your help with this!
.

[Vlawde]

Since the figure is obvious in that area, I'm assuming the submitter was just trying to fool us

[JIMOverSeer]

That's entered my mind as well.

[AlmarRido]

I have 2 photos that i know are real. Can i still post it here? Do you still check for photos here?

[Vlawde]

Well, I look under new content when I first come here and saw this. But you may be better off in the'Share Your Paranormal Photos & Videos'   Forum.

I would beware of claiming they are real, however. They may or may not be