23 replies to this topic

[Mikaru]

I've posted this one before but didn't really get very far with it so I did a little editing to make it more clear.

https://instaud.io/1eBn

VERY light noise reduction and gain increase

I think it says

Spoiler

Sweet Lucifer... burn or boo

[KlaineyGStudy]

My ears are on and I so want to hit your spoiler tag. LOL. Be back after I listen

[KlaineyGStudy]

Spoiler

Submit

I think that is what I am hearing right at the start

[Mikaru]

KlaineyGStudy, on 05 September 2017 - 01:32 AM, said:

Spoiler

Submit

I think that is what I am hearing right at the start

Your take on it throws it in a darker, yet more meaningful direction. Thank you.

[CDS]

There are several 'layered' responses. Also the left channel differs from the right.

[Vlawde]

I'm hearing something totally different

Spoiler

It's the manager

[Mikaru]

CDS, on 05 September 2017 - 06:03 AM, said:

There are several 'layered' responses. Also the left channel differs from the right.

Thank you for taking a look at it. If you have time, would you be willing to break it down to hear the layered responses?

VlawdeGStudy, on 05 September 2017 - 07:54 AM, said:

I'm hearing something totally different

Spoiler

It's the manager

That's an interesting spin. Thank you.

[siguie]

Yeah I get nuthin

It's just some faint clicking or ghost stuttering ... maybe

[EVP]

You might draw your own conclusion Mikaru from doing a reverse on the audio file. I have mixed feelings about reverse EVP's but there is a general interest in the community listening to them in that way. I deem it as a Class C although I somewhat concur with Chris with multi-layering.

Edited by EVP, 05 September 2017 - 05:49 PM.

[Mikaru]

siguie, on 05 September 2017 - 03:14 PM, said:

Yeah I get nuthin

It's just some faint clicking or ghost stuttering ... maybe

Thanks for the input. I appreciate it.

EVP, on 05 September 2017 - 05:47 PM, said:

You might draw your own conclusion Mikaru from doing a reverse on the audio file. I have mixed feelings about reverse EVP's but there is a general interest in the community listening to them in that way. I deem it as a Class C although I somewhat concur with Chris with multi-layering.

I'll go ahead and reverse it. I don't normally do this though.

[Mikaru]

What should I listen/look for to see if there are layered responses?

[EVP]

Quote

I'll go ahead and reverse it. I don't normally do this though.

I don't either.

Quote

What should I listen/look for to see if there are layered responses?

IMO layered responses just brings the mind to interpret what it think it hears from multiple combined voices but it's very similar to pareidolia and just leads you into a loop of confusion. You might not particularly like hearing this but when it becomes impossible/improbable to accurately determine what is said specifically, I don't waste much time on them. It's a fruitless tree that will never grow into anything meaningful. Sorry, I know that sounds negative and I appreciate your enthusiasm Mikaru but just move on and just record again. Class C's are the most common and are filed under "G" in a special folder for me


Feel free to pipe in Chris...I like learning, I'd like to hear your take.

Edited by EVP, 06 September 2017 - 01:46 AM.

[chapsparanormal]

I am afraid I am in the same boat I don't get anything from it

[Mikaru]

EVP, on 06 September 2017 - 01:41 AM, said:

I don't either.



IMO layered responses just brings the mind to interpret what it think it hears from multiple combined voices but it's very similar to pareidolia and just leads you into a loop of confusion. You might not particularly like hearing this but when it becomes impossible/improbable to accurately determine what is said specifically, I don't waste much time on them. It's a fruitless tree that will never grow into anything meaningful. Sorry, I know that sounds negative and I appreciate your enthusiasm Mikaru but just move on and just record again. Class C's are the most common and are filed under "G" in a special folder for me


Feel free to pipe in Chris...I like learning, I'd like to hear your take.

I'll consider it a capture of class G then. I don't mind. At least I caught something!

[KlaineyGStudy]

Mikaru, on 06 September 2017 - 06:00 PM, said:

I'll consider it a capture of class G then. I don't mind. At least I caught something!

Yes, you did   But wasn't it a " Class C filed under G" can I ask what is "G" I am off to google

[Mikaru]

KlaineyGStudy, on 06 September 2017 - 09:25 PM, said:

Yes, you did   But wasn't it a " Class C filed under G" can I ask what is "G" I am off to google

G is garbage lol

[KlaineyGStudy]

Mikaru, on 07 September 2017 - 05:10 AM, said:

G is garbage lol

LOL, Is that what it is or did you make that up

[Lunabug47]

Hi! I'm new here, so I apologize for not knowing how to make a spoiler button. A friend and I have listened to it, and we both think it says either

Spoiler

"submitting to anger" or "submit into anger".

[KlaineyGStudy]

Lunabug47, on 09 September 2017 - 06:41 PM, said:

Hi! I'm new here, so I apologize for not knowing how to make a spoiler button. A friend and I have listened to it, and we both think it says either

Spoiler

"submitting to anger" or "submit into anger".

Lunabug47

I added the spoiler for you, I thought it was something you would like, if you knew how to do it Thanks for sharing what you heard

[CDS]

Mikaru, on 05 September 2017 - 11:05 AM, said:

Thank you for taking a look at it. If you have time, would you be willing to break it down to hear the layered responses?

Yes, I will try as time permits, which has been scares lately, and if you're willing to provide the original unedited extended time snippet. See below.

Mikaru, on 06 September 2017 - 01:00 AM, said:

What should I listen/look for to see if there are layered responses?

Below is the file loaded in Audition, We can see the wave form, on top and the Spectral Frequency Display for each channel Left is over Right below the wave form.




When I work with audio, most of what I do is directly in the Spectral Frequency Display. Notice the Right channel is not the same as the Left, above it, on the low end 100 to 400Hz. I would like more of this particular recording. This is also interesting in its layering of responses, which is not that rare. I broke a few layered down for Tantric Kitten a few months back, posted with images and sound bytes.

In this case, I'm more interested in the difference between the channels in the lower end, 100 to 400 Hz. But I'll try to pull out a few layers. There is a rather easy one I've already Isolated in the 1k Hz to 2k Hz level.